Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Military vs. State Dept. over Blackwater

According to this Washington Post article, the U.S. military has about had it with private security contractors like Blackwater:

A confrontation between the U.S. military and the State Department is unfolding over the involvement of Blackwater USA in the shooting deaths of Iraqi civilians in a Baghdad square Sept. 16, bringing to the surface long-simmering tensions between the military and private security companies in Iraq, according to U.S. military and government officials.

In high-level meetings over the past several days, U.S. military officials have pressed State Department officials to assert more control over Blackwater, which operates under the department's authority, said a U.S. government official with knowledge of the discussions. "The military is very sensitive to its relationship that they've built with the Iraqis being altered or even severely degraded by actions such as this event," the official said.

"This is a nightmare," said a senior U.S. military official. "We had guys who saw the aftermath, and it was very bad. This is going to hurt us badly. It may be worse than Abu Ghraib, and it comes at a time when we're trying to have an impact for the long term." The official was referring to the prison scandal that emerged in 2004 in which U.S. soldiers tortured and abused Iraqis.

A confrontation between the U.S. military and the State Department is unfolding over the involvement of Blackwater USA in the shooting deaths of Iraqi civilians in a Baghdad square Sept. 16, bringing to the surface long-simmering tensions between the military and private security companies in Iraq, according to U.S. military and government officials.

In high-level meetings over the past several days, U.S. military officials have pressed State Department officials to assert more control over Blackwater, which operates under the department's authority, said a U.S. government official with knowledge of the discussions. "The military is very sensitive to its relationship that they've built with the Iraqis being altered or even severely degraded by actions such as this event," the official said.

"This is a nightmare," said a senior U.S. military official. "We had guys who saw the aftermath, and it was very bad. This is going to hurt us badly. It may be worse than Abu Ghraib, and it comes at a time when we're trying to have an impact for the long term." The official was referring to the prison scandal that emerged in 2004 in which U.S. soldiers tortured and abused Iraqis.

Worse than Abu Ghraib? Given how bad Abu Ghraib was for the mission in Iraq, that's saying something. But the article makes note of the fact that the DOD is in no rush to assert their own control over the contractors, pushing State instead to do something about the problem. So it would seem that Blackwater is operating not only in a legal muddle, but in a political one. Everybody wants them reigned in, but nobody wants to be the one to have to do it. Again the problem is the extent to which the government relies upon these contractors in Iraq. They serve a vital function in an arena in which there are too many missions and not enough troops, and that's a problem that won't go away anytime soon whatever oversight reforms are made.

1 comment:

adam said...

We should never use people like this in wars again.